Lowest Common Denominator

The point of the media is to inform the public and hold accountable various actors, such as governments and businesses. When functioning properly, the media acts as a crucial element of democratic countries. When compromised, the media undermines democracy and accountability, serving only specialized interests.

When the media is criticized today, it is generally shallow and partisan; either the media is too liberal or too conservative. I do not believe the media’s main problem is its place on the political spectrum. Yes, certain media outlets can act too partisan. But in general, I believe calling the media liberal or conservative is a clever political ploy. Saying the CBC is left-wing eventually forces the CBC to move to the right which, in turn, moves all political talk right of where it used to be. And calling the mainstream media “liberal” is a genius tactic by conservatives to explain away any political wrongdoing by conservatives and any political rightdoing by liberals. If it is reported on the news that the U.S. unemployment rate has fallen, this is attributed simply to “liberal bias” and not Obama’s policies. Similarly, if Sarah Palin calls Africa a country, media reports of this are explained away by shouts of “liberal bias.”

These are simply political ploys and do not get at the real problem with mainstream media. The media’s main problem today, particularly in the U.S. is its laziness and sensationalism. This stems naturally from our economic system that demands profit. Private media outlets need to attract advertisements, so they need to attract viewership. It is not profitable, therefore, to research a story in-depth and report on important global issues. Instead, the media focuses on trivial matters and stories that would be better suited for MTV or TMZ.

Recently, over about four days, I decided to take screenshots of some of CNN’s featured stories. This is a very unscientific way of proving my point, but I think it it’s effective nonetheless. CNN has moved from a valuable news organization to one that drives viewership by appealing to populist and unimportant “stories.”

 Image Image  Image
I’m not sure if they do it just because of their popularity or because there’s an actual corporate interest involved, but I’ve noticed that CNN loves to promote Facebook and Apple. Sure, thousands of people are dying in Syria protesting a brutal regime. But this turtle was really old.

The feel-good story of the year.

 Image  Image Image 
Well, at least it will make me feel better about myself. I don’t even want to know. Alright, fine, I watched this one.

Image Image

Even if they did fight, I’m not sure how this would qualify as news.

Just a regular New Yorker. Nothing to see here.


 Image Image Image

So do I, but you don’t see CNN making a story about that.

I know CNN is trying to attract viewership, but who exactly would click on something like this? In other news, the sky is still blue and water is still wet.
 Image Image   Image
Self-explanatory. I honestly have no idea what this means, but I’m sure it’s terrible. Isn’t it where you go and worship Tom Cruise?
 Image Image   Image
Okay, this isn’t as bad. But still. This fails to be relevant in any possible way. I know that feeling. I hope that dog has good insurance.
 Image  Image  Image
Quality journalism. First of all, don’t say “gotta.” Second of all, what the hell?

No. I refuse.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s